PatentOS vs DeepIP · PatentOS

PatentOS

PatentOS versus DeepIP: system, not point tool.

The comparison is not a feature checklist. PatentOS keeps filing decisions, portfolio review, valuation and transactions in one record.

Point tools optimize a step.

Search, drafting, and charting tools can improve one motion, but the decision record often breaks between motions.

PatentOS keeps the record together.

Claims, evidence, value, dissent, and review history stay attached to the asset and the decision.

Counsel remains in control.

External action stays gated by people. The system supplies evidence, uncertainty, and reviewable work product.

Operating principles

  • PatentOS by IP Rich, built in Tokyo for Japanese and US patent work.
  • Native JP and US patent workflows, not translation as an afterthought.
  • Separate AI roles, one role that combines their results, a dissent log and specialist review.

Next step

Discuss this workflow

Send a patent number, product target, portfolio size, or decision you need to make. We will review it and get back to you.