Layer 01
Cross-checks by multiple AIs
Critical analyses are cross-checked by multiple AIs. When their answers differ, the finding is flagged and sent to human review. Agreement between AIs is never, on its own, a conclusion.
06 / Precision
Evidence you can review, clearly marked.
In patent work, a small miss can change the conclusion. PatentOS does not rely on a single model call; it checks the evidence through four layers.
Four layers
Critical output passes through verification before external action.
Layer 02
Confidence intervals
Numerical outputs come with stated confidence intervals, not point estimates. Revenue estimates, infringement likelihood, claim breadth, validity strength. Every figure shows its uncertainty so attorneys can weight it correctly.
Layer 03
Source citations
Every claim element traces to its evidence, and every prior art reference to the specific paragraph. No assertion without a source.
Layer 04
Counsel review path
Important deliverables can go to your own counsel, or to a partner patent attorney you engage directly. Low-confidence outputs are flagged for specialist review instead of being presented as final.
Why this matters
A bad claim chart costs more than a manual one.
Analysis without clear evidence becomes a weak point in later negotiations and decisions. That is why PatentOS always keeps sources and uncertainty visible.
PatentOS is designed by people with hands-on IP practice. The four layers are not for show. They draw the line that lets work product hold up in review.
By design
What supports precision.
Multiple AIs
Findings cross-checked
Cited
Important assertions keep their source
Route
High-stakes outputs to counsel review
A / B / C
Conviction grades on every finding
What we do not do
Some honesty about the limits.
No
Autonomous filing.
PatentOS does not file applications, send licensing letters, or initiate litigation on its own. Every external action is gated by a human decision.
No
Legal advice.
PatentOS gives evidence and statistics, not legal opinions. If you need a legal opinion, ask your own patent attorney or lawyer.
No
Training on your data.
Customer documents are not used to train PatentOS models. Your portfolio analysis stays in your tenant. Full details in our data processing addendum.
No
Unmarked certainty.
When the data is thin, the platform says so. Confidence intervals widen, conviction grades drop, and review paths are surfaced. We do not paper over uncertainty.
Verify it yourself
Audit our precision on a case you already worked.
Send a patent and a product where you already know the answer. We will return the platform's analysis side by side with the ground truth. You judge.