Council verification
Evidence, Logic, Citation, and Counterargument personas independently scrutinize each finding before it advances. Counterarguments surface design-around risks early.
4 council roles
by IP RichFor Corporate IP Departments
Every year, valuable patents are abandoned because the maintenance call is made on a hunch. PatentOS gives your team evidence, A/B/C ranking, Japan revenue at risk, infringers you didn't know existed.
What's at risk
Most corporate IP teams review hundreds of patents per year on partial information. Maintenance decisions get made under deadline. Infringement of your own patents goes undetected because nobody has the time to look.
How it works
Drop in a CSV of patent numbers, yours, your acquisition target's, or a watchlist. JP and US patents in one workflow.
Council review decomposes claims, hunts infringing products, preserves agreement and dissent, and estimates revenue exposure with cited sources.
Anything ranked A (high infringement, high revenue) can be routed to your counsel, PatentOS patent attorneys, or both before action.
A heatmap, a rank, a revenue estimate, and an evidence package, per patent. Maintain, license, sell, enforce, or let lapse. Confidently.
Built differently
Procurement teams ask: "why this system?" PatentOS runs a bounded council across evidence, logic, citations, and counterarguments, then leaves a reviewable decision record your legal team can inspect.
Evidence, Logic, Citation, and Counterargument personas independently scrutinize each finding before it advances. Counterarguments surface design-around risks early.
4 council rolesContradictions are retained as reviewable notes instead of being averaged into false confidence. Counsel can see where the system was uncertain.
Reviewable uncertaintyExact, semantic, and source-specific retrieval work together so important assertions point back to product evidence, filings, or technical material.
Cited evidenceA synthesizer reconciles council output into a decision record with sources, uncertainty, and escalation notes.
One review recordJPO claim structures with FI/F-term classification handled natively. USPTO means-plus-function detection. Japanese Jitsuyou Shin'an supported. No translation layer that drops nuance.
Both jurisdictions nativeHigh-conviction findings move forward, ambiguous findings route to review, and weak findings are rejected with the reason preserved.
Every important decision keeps reasoning notes, source citations, and timestamps. Months later you can reproduce why a maintenance call was made.
Foreign parent → Japan entity automatically resolved (e.g., Apple Inc. → Apple Japan合同会社). Critical for Japan revenue estimation; impossible to do manually at scale.
Every 弁理士 correction feeds back into the model evaluation pipeline. The system gets more accurate as your team uses it. Domain-specific accuracy targets enforced per technology area.
Use Cases
Four scenarios where PatentOS replaces guesswork with evidence, and surfaces value your team didn't know was there.
Triage 1,000+ patents in days, not months. A/B/C ranking with revenue evidence, keep what's valuable, drop what's not, and never accidentally abandon an A-ranked patent again.
Continuous surveillance for products that infringe your patents. PatentOS scans Japanese e-commerce, manufacturer websites, and corporate filings. Find the infringers your competitors miss.
Quantitative valuation by patent and aggregate. Japan revenue at risk × infringement probability × remaining patent life. Hand it to CFO with confidence intervals.
Evaluate a target company's portfolio in days, not months. Hidden gems, weak claims, prior-art exposure, quantified before the LOI.
Sample Output
Every analysis ships as a portfolio heatmap, an A/B/C ranking, a revenue estimate, and a litigation-grade claim chart per high-rank patent. Download a real anonymized example.
View sample outputs →Built by people who've been you
PatentOS's product team includes operators from Fuji Xerox's IP department and patent attorneys from major Japanese firms. We've sat in the seat where the maintenance call is yours and the budget pressure is real.
A-rank findings can be reviewed by your counsel, PatentOS patent attorneys, or both.
Per-tenant isolation. Your patents and analyses never train shared models. SOC2 roadmap published on /trust.
Built for both jurisdictions from day one. JPO and USPTO claim structures handled natively.
Every AI decision logged with reasoning chain. Defensible if a maintenance decision is ever questioned.
Plan your engagement
Pricing, delivery time, and review scope are agreed in advance for each engagement. Tell us the patent count, target products, and the decision you need to support.
FAQ
Bring your highest-stakes patent, or your annual maintenance shortlist. We'll run PatentOS on it live with your team. If it doesn't surface something you didn't already know, you walk away.